Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 52
Filtrar
1.
Eur Stroke J ; : 23969873241251722, 2024 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711259

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a frequent neurological emergency which management and definition have changed radically over the last 15 years. However, recent epidemiological studies of TIA are scarce. We report here on the impact of the shift from a time-based to a tissue-based definition of TIA on its incidence and risk of recurrence in a new population-based cohort with a high rate of patients investigated by MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively included all TIAs that occurred between May 2017 and May 2021 from the Normandy Stroke Study, a population-based registry using multiple overlapping sources for exhaustive case identification in Caen la Mer area. TIAs were classified as either time-based (symptoms <24 h) or tissue-based (<24 h and no lesion on brain imaging). Attack and incidence rates were calculated, as was the 90-day ischemic stroke rate. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-seven TIAs (549 single patients) were included, with 80.6% having a brain MRI. Four hundred and ten (72.3%) met the definition of tissue-based TIA. The age standardized attack (to the 2013 European population) rate was 39.5 (95% CI 35.7-43.5) and the age-standardized incidence rate (first ever cerebrovascular event) was 29.7 (95% CI 27.3-34.2). The overall recurrent stroke rate at 90 days was 2.7%, with no difference between patients with or without ischemic lesions on MRI. CONCLUSION: We found that the use of the tissue-based definition of TIA resulted in a 27.5% reduction in incidence as compared to the time-based definition, but had no impact on the 90-day stroke rate. The burden of TIA remains high, and is likely to increase as the population ages.

2.
Gut ; 72(10): 1904-1918, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37463757

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: New screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) are rapidly emerging. Conducting trials with mortality reduction as the end point supporting their adoption is challenging. We re-examined the principles underlying evaluation of new non-invasive tests in view of technological developments and identification of new biomarkers. DESIGN: A formal consensus approach involving a multidisciplinary expert panel revised eight previously established principles. RESULTS: Twelve newly stated principles emerged. Effectiveness of a new test can be evaluated by comparison with a proven comparator non-invasive test. The faecal immunochemical test is now considered the appropriate comparator, while colonoscopy remains the diagnostic standard. For a new test to be able to meet differing screening goals and regulatory requirements, flexibility to adjust its positivity threshold is desirable. A rigorous and efficient four-phased approach is proposed, commencing with small studies assessing the test's ability to discriminate between CRC and non-cancer states (phase I), followed by prospective estimation of accuracy across the continuum of neoplastic lesions in neoplasia-enriched populations (phase II). If these show promise, a provisional test positivity threshold is set before evaluation in typical screening populations. Phase III prospective studies determine single round intention-to-screen programme outcomes and confirm the test positivity threshold. Phase IV studies involve evaluation over repeated screening rounds with monitoring for missed lesions. Phases III and IV findings will provide the real-world data required to model test impact on CRC mortality and incidence. CONCLUSION: New non-invasive tests can be efficiently evaluated by a rigorous phased comparative approach, generating data from unbiased populations that inform predictions of their health impact.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Tamizaje Masivo , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Colonoscopía , Sangre Oculta , Heces
3.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 21(3): 265-272.e7, 2023 02 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36812938

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer may be particularly vulnerable to psychological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. We studied the prevalence and evolution of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in patients with cancer during the pandemic waves, and we investigated factors associated with high symptoms. METHODS: COVIPACT is a 1-year longitudinal prospective study of French patients with solid/hematologic malignancies receiving treatment during the first nationwide lockdown. PTSS were measured every 3 months from April 2020 using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Patients also completed questionnaires on their quality of life, cognitive complaints, insomnia, and COVID-19 lockdown experience. RESULTS: Longitudinal analyses involved 386 patients with at least one PTSS assessment after baseline (median age, 63 years; 76% female). Among them, 21.5% had moderate/severe PTSS during the first lockdown. The rate of patients reporting PTSS decreased at lockdown release (13.6%), increased again at second lockdown (23.2%), and slightly declined from the second release period (22.7%) to the third lockdown (17.5%). Patients were grouped into 3 trajectories of evolution. Most patients had stable low symptoms throughout the period, 6% had high baseline symptoms slowly decreasing over time, and 17.6% had moderate symptoms worsening during the second lockdown. Female sex, feeling socially isolated, worrying about COVID-19 infection, and using psychotropic drugs were associated with PTSS. PTSS were associated with impaired quality of life, sleep, and cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-fourth of patients with cancer experienced high and persistent PTSS over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and may benefit from psychological support. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04366154.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología
4.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 17, 2023 Jan 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36604640

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We have done a systematic literature review about CRC Screening over 75 years old in order to update knowledge and make recommendations. METHODS: PUBMED database was searched in October 2021 for articles published on CRC screening in the elderly, and generated 249 articles. Further searches were made to find articles on the acceptability, efficacy, and harms of screening in this population, together with the state of international guidelines. RESULTS: Most benefit-risk data on CRC screening in the over 75 s derived from simulation studies. Most guidelines recommend stopping cancer screening at the age of 75. In private health systems, extension of screening up to 80-85 years is, based on the life expectancy and the history of screening. Screening remains effective in populations without comorbidity given their better life-expectancy. Serious adverse events of colonoscopy increase with age and can outweigh the benefit of screening. The great majority of reviews concluded that screening between 75 and 85 years must be decided case by case. CONCLUSION: The current literature does not allow Evidence-Based Medicine propositions for mass screening above 75 years old. As some subjects over 75 years may benefit from CRC screening, we discussed ways to introduce CRC screening in France in the 75-80 age group. IRB: An institutional review board composed of members of the 2 learned societies (SOFOG and FFCD) defined the issues of interest, followed the evolution of the work and reviewed and validated the report.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Anciano , Humanos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Colonoscopía , Tamizaje Masivo , Comorbilidad , Esperanza de Vida , Detección Precoz del Cáncer
5.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 80: 102240, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36058037

RESUMEN

BACKGROUNDS: The value of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in a population with a limited participation rate is debated. This study assesses the real-life performances of different screening tests in a population benefiting from an organized program and included in a cancer registry. METHODS: Patients who participated in at least one screening campaign between 2004 and 2016 were included. Four screening procedures were used: Hemoccult II, Magstream, Hemoccult and Magstream combined, and OC Sensor. Data were crossed with the Digestive Cancer Registry of Calvados to detect CRCs diagnosed during this period. The main outcomes were CRC detection and the incidence rate of interval cancers. RESULTS: Screening consisted of 325,083 tests in 134,498 patients. Of the 2580 CRCs detected in patients aged 50-74, 534 (20.7 %) were screen-detected. OC Sensor had the highest sensitivity for CRC detection (83.7 %, 95 % CI [76.8-89.1 %]) and the lowest interval cancer rate (2.0 per 10,000 person-years, 95 % CI [1.4-2.7]) compared with other screening tests, excluding combinations. The overall participation rate was 28.9 %. CONCLUSION: Real-life differences in performance between different screening tests exist, and OC Sensor appears to be the best. The low participation rate suggests that the rate of screen-detected CRC could be higher.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Sangre Oculta
6.
ACR Open Rheumatol ; 4(9): 753-759, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35695768

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The incidence rate of giant cell arteritis (GCA) is poorly studied in France. Therefore, we conducted a national hospital database study to assess the overall and regional incidence rates of GCA in France, including overseas territories. METHODS: Through the national hospitalization database of all patients hospitalized in France, new incidental GCA was identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision medical codes (M31.5 = GCA; M31.6 = GCA and polymyalgia rheumatica [PMR]) during 2013-2019. The regional incidences were analyzed by graphical methods and Poisson regression. RESULTS: A total of 16,540 new GCA with or without PMR diagnoses were identified in all French hospitals over 7 years. The female/male ratio was 1.8. The crude annual incidence rate of GCA with or without PMR was 9.64 (9.50-9.79) per 100,000 persons aged 50 years or older in continental France and 2.91 (2.35-3.47) in overseas areas. The GCA with or without PMR incidence rate regularly increased with age in both sexes but with a later peak in men (85 vs 80 years in women). The crude incidence rate was 11.43 (11.21-11.65) in women and 7.50 (7.31-7.70) in men. An east-western gradient was noted with an increasing standardized incident rate (SIR) from east to west (P < 10-3 ) using a departmental stratification of incident rates. Of note, all SIRs in continental regions were higher than those in overseas areas. CONCLUSION: This French nationwide study provides new and dynamic insights regarding GCA with or without PMR incident rates at the country and regional levels. Important rate differences were observed between continental France and the overseas areas.

7.
Cancer ; 127(24): 4636-4645, 2021 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34398970

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic may induce post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms among patients with cancer, who also face adaptations to their treatment. The authors assessed the occurrence of PTSD symptoms, investigated pandemic-induced adjustments in medical oncology practice in patients with cancer, and explored risk factors for PTSD and the association between PTSD symptoms, insomnia, and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This prospective French study was conducted in patients with solid/hematologic tumors who were receiving medical treatment in the day care departments of 2 cancer centers during the lockdown. Adjustments to medical oncology practice were collected from medical records. PTSD (measured using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised), insomnia (measured using the Insomnia Severity Index), QoL (measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General instrument), and cognitive complaints (measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function instrument) were collected through validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Clinical data and questionnaires were available for 734 and 576 patients, respectively. The median patient age was 64 years, and 69% of patients were women. Twenty-one percent of patients had PTSD. Twenty-seven percent (95% CI, 23%-30%) had an adjustment in their medical oncology program, including adjournments (29%), treatment interruptions (16%), modified treatment plans (27%), or adapted monitoring (27%). Women and patients experiencing an adjustment in oncology practice had a higher odds of PTSD (odds ratio= 2.10 [95% CI, 1.07-4.14] and 1.65 [95% CI, 1.03-2.63]; P < .05). PTSD symptoms were correlated with worse scores for QoL, cognition, and insomnia. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-one percent of patients with cancer experienced PTSD symptoms associated with poor QoL during the first COVID-19-induced lockdown. Medical oncology practice was adjusted in approximately one-quarter of patients and was associated with the occurrence of PTSD symptoms. Psychosocial support should be offered in cancer centers to promote emotional resilience and avoid PTSD symptoms in patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Centros de Día , Neoplasias , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Adulto , COVID-19/psicología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Femenino , Francia , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Oncología Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/psicología , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/etiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología
8.
Am J Epidemiol ; 190(3): 376-385, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32964219

RESUMEN

We aimed to investigate the association between use of anticancer drugs and cardiovascular-related hospitalization (CVRH) among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A cohort study, the Anticancer Vigilance of Cardiac Events (AVOCETTE) Study, was conducted using data from the digestive tumor registry of a French county, the Département du Calvados. Incident mCRC cases diagnosed between 2008 and 2014 were included. The follow-up end date was December 31, 2016. Data from the county hospital center pharmacy and medical information departments were matched with the registry data. A competing-risks approach was used. Statistical tests were 2-sided. A total of 1,116 mCRC patients were included, and they were administered 12,374 rounds of treatment; fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab were most common drugs used. A total of 208 CVRH events occurred in 145 patients (13.0%). The International Cancer Survival Standards type 1 standardized incidence was 84.0 CVRH per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval: 72.6, 95.5). Anticancer drugs were not associated with a higher incidence of CVRH. Male sex, increasing age, a prior history of CVRH, and a higher Charlson comorbidity index score were associated with a higher incidence of CVRH. CVRH was significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality (multivariable hazard ratio = 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 1.28, 1.95). In this study, anticancer drugs were not associated with a higher incidence of CVRH in mCRC patients.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales
9.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 29(5): 458-465, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740172

RESUMEN

Some of the inequality in uterine cervical cancer (UCC) screening uptake are due to the socioeconomic deprivation of women. A national organized screening programme has proven to be effective in increasing the uptake, but may increase socioeconomic inequality. Therefore, we compared inequality in uptake of UCC screening between two French departments, one of which is experimenting an organized screening programme. We used reimbursement data from the main French health insurance scheme to compare screening rates in the municipalities of the two departments over a three-year period. The experimental department had higher screening rates, but the increase in deprivation in municipalities had a greater effect on the decrease in participation in this department. Moreover, while screening rates were higher in urban areas, the negative effect of deprivation on participation was greater in rural areas. Although these departments were compared at the same time under different conditions, socioeconomic inequality between them may have been greater before the experimentation started. However, screening may have led to an increase in socioeconomic inequality between women screened. Special attention must be paid to changes in socioeconomic and geographic inequality in the uptake of UCC screening when the programme is rolled out nationally.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Factores Socioeconómicos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/tendencias , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología
10.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 693, 2020 Jul 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32718319

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening is effective in reducing mortality due to uterine cervical cancer (UCC). However, inequalities in participation in UCC screening exist, especially according to age and social status. Considering the current situation in France regarding the ongoing organized UCC screening campaign, we aimed to assess general practitioners' (GPs) and gynaecologists' preferences for actions designed to reduce screening inequalities. METHODS: French physicians' preferences to UCC screening modalities was assessed using a discrete choice experiment. A national cross-sectional questionnaire was sent between September and October 2014 to 500 randomly selected physicians, and numerically to all targeted physicians working in the French region Midi-Pyrénées. Practitioners were offered 11 binary choices of organized screening scenarios in order to reduce inequalities in UCC screening participation. Each scenario was based on five attributes corresponding to five ways to enhance participation in UCC screening while reducing screening inequalities. RESULTS: Among the 123 respondents included, practitioners voted for additional interventions targeting non-screened women overall (p <  0.05), including centralized invitations sent from a central authority and involving the mentioned attending physician, or providing attending physicians with the lists of unscreened women among their patients. However, they rejected the specific targeting of women over 50 years old (p <  0.01) or living in deprived areas (p <  0.05). Only GPs were in favour of allowing nurses to perform Pap smears, but both GPs and gynaecologists rejected self-collected oncogenic papillomavirus testing. CONCLUSIONS: French practitioners tended to value the traditional principle of universalism. As well as rejecting self-collected oncogenic papillomavirus testing, their reluctance to support the principle of proportionate universalism relying on additional interventions addressing differences in socioeconomic status needs further evaluation. As these two concepts have already been recommended as secondary development leads for the French national organized screening campaign currently being implemented, the adherence of practitioners and the adaptation of these concepts are necessary conditions for reducing inequalities in health care.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Francia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prueba de Papanicolaou/estadística & datos numéricos , Papillomaviridae , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0232814, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32413044

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening rates are known to be strongly associated with socioeconomic status. Our objective was to assess whether the rate is also associated with an aggregated deprivation marker, defined by the location of family doctors' offices. METHODS: To access this association, we 1) collected data from the claim database of the French Health Insurance Fund about the registered family doctors and their enlisted female patients eligible for cervical screening; 2) carried out a telephone survey with all registered doctors to establish if they were carrying out Pap-smears in their practices; 3) geotracked all the doctors' offices in the smallest existing blocks of socioeconomic homogenous populations (IRIS census units) that were assigned a census derived marker of deprivation, the European Deprivation Index (EDI), and a binary variable of urbanization; and 4) we used a multivariable linear mixed model with IRIS as a random effect. RESULTS: Of 348 eligible doctors, 343 responded to the telephone survey (98.6%) and were included in the analysis, encompassing 88,152 female enlisted patients aged 25-65 years old. In the multivariable analysis (adjusted by the gender of the family doctor, the practice of Pap-smears by the doctor and the urbanization of the office location), the EDI of the doctor's office was strongly associated with the cervical cancer screening participation rate of eligible patients (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The EDI linked to the location of the family doctor's office seems to be a robust marker to predict female patients' participation in cervical cancer screening.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Privación de Alimentos/fisiología , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prueba de Papanicolaou , Consultorios Médicos , Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Clase Social , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Frotis Vaginal
12.
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging ; 2(3): e190189, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33778583

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the comparative diagnostic accuracy of cardiac CT and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the detection of valvular and perivalvular complications in infective endocarditis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched until July 2019 for original articles published in English. Studies were included if (a) they used CT and/or TEE as an index test, (b) data were provided as infective endocarditis valvular complications (classified as abscess or pseudoaneurysm, vegetation, leaflet perforation, and paravalvular leakage), and (c) they used surgical findings as the reference standard. RESULTS: Eight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity was higher for CT than TEE for abscess or pseudoaneurysm detection, 78% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70%, 85%) (112 of 142) versus 69% (95% CI: 62%, 76%) (94 of 135) (P = .052) and increased to 87% (95% CI: 78%, 93%) (70 of 79) when restricted to multiphase CT studies, the difference being significant (P = .04). The sensitivity was significantly higher for TEE than CT for vegetation detection, 94% (95% CI: 92%, 96%) (363 of 383) versus 64% (95% CI: 57%, 70%) (151 of 237) (P < .001) and leaflet perforation detection, 81% (95% CI: 71%, 88%) (74 of 91) versus 41% (95% CI: 25%, 59%) (14 of 35) (P = .02).The sensitivity for paravalvular leakage was 69% (95% CI: 58%, 79%) (56 of 80) versus 44% (95% CI: 30%, 59%) (21 of 48) for TEE and CT, respectively (P = .27). CONCLUSION: CT performs better than TEE in the detection of abscess or pseudoaneurysm whereas TEE gives superior results for vegetation detection, leaflet perforation, and paravalvular leakage.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020.

13.
Value Health ; 22(10): 1111-1118, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563253

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading cancer in terms of incidence and mortality among women in France. Effective organized screening does exist, however, the participation rate is low, and negatively associated with a low socioeconomic status and remoteness. OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-effectiveness of a mobile mammography (MM) program to increase participation in breast cancer screening and reduce geographic and social inequalities. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis from retrospective data was conducted from the payer perspective, comparing an invitation to a mobile mammography unit (MMU) or to a radiologist's office (MM or RO group) with an invitation to a radiologist's office only (RO group) (n = 37 461). Medical and nonmedical direct costs were estimated. Outcome was screening participation. The mean incremental cost and effect, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve were estimated. RESULTS: The mean incremental cost for invitation to MM or RO was estimated to be €23.21 (95% CI, 22.64-23.78) compared with RO only, and with a point of participation gain of 3.8% (95% CI, 2.8-4.8), resulting in an incremental cost per additional screen of €610.69 (95% CI, 492.11-821.01). The gain of participation was more important in women living in deprived areas and for distances exceeding 15 km from an RO. CONCLUSION: Screening involving a MMU can increase participation in breast cancer screening and reduce geographic and social inequalities while being more cost-effective in remote areas and in deprived areas. Because of the retrospective design, further research is needed to provide more evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using a MMU for organized breast cancer screening and to determine the optimal conditions for implementing it.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Mamografía , Unidades Móviles de Salud/economía , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Francia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad
14.
Eur Radiol ; 29(6): 3044-3061, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30617482

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic performance of cardiac computed tomography (CT)-based modalities including coronary CT angiography (CTA), stress myocardial CT perfusion (stress CTP), computer simulation of fractional flow reserve by CT (FFRCT), and transluminal attenuation gradients (TAG), for the diagnosis of hemodynamic significant coronary artery disease (CAD), using invasive fractional flow reserve as the reference standard. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for original articles until July 2018. Diagnostic accuracy results were pooled at per-patient and per-vessel level using random effect models. RESULTS: Fifty articles were included in the meta-analysis (3024 subjects). The per-patient analysis per imaging modality demonstrated a pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 1.78 (95% confidence interval CI 1.49-2.11), 4.58 (95% CI 3.54-5.91), and 3.45 (95% CI 2.38-5.00) for CTA, stress CTP, and FFRCT respectively. Per-patient specificity of stress CTP (82%, 95% CI 76-86) and FFRCT (72%, 95% CI 68-76) were higher than for CTA (48%, 95% CI 44-51). At the vessel level, PLR was 2.42 (95% CI 1.93-3.02), 7.72 (95% CI 5.50-10.83), 3.50 (95% CI 2.73-4.78), 1.97 (95% CI 1.32-2.93) for CTA, stress CTP, FFRCT, and TAG respectively. CONCLUSION: With improved PLR and specificity, stress CTP and FFRCT have incremental value over CTA for the detection of functionally significant CAD. KEY POINTS: • New functional CT imaging techniques, such as stress CTP and FFRCT, improve diagnostic accuracy of coronary CTA to predict hemodynamically relevant stenosis. • TAG yields poor diagnostic performance. • Combination of CTA and some functional CT techniques (stress CTP and FFRCT) might become a "must" to improve diagnostic accuracy of CAD and to reduce unnecessary invasive coronary angiography.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Simulación por Computador , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/fisiopatología , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
15.
J Cancer Educ ; 34(4): 823-830, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29926431

RESUMEN

The therapeutic education of patients and their close relations is, as yet, poorly developed in France in the field of oncology. Total laryngectomy is a mutilating surgical procedure having a major impact on the patient's life, due to its physical and functional sequelae. Its psychosocial consequences are also important and alter the quality of life of patients and their close relations. Currently, care for laryngectomised patients consists essentially in informing and educating them on some technical procedures during hospital admission. The intervention of a speech therapist, often serves as the link between the patient and the hospital care team. These healthcare modalities often insufficiently account for the social, environmental and personal factors that interact in health-related problems. This report presents the therapeutic education programme protocol "PETAL" for laryngectomised patients and their close relations to improve their quality of life. The trial will be conducted over three phases: (1) the "pilot" phase aims at developing knowledge on the consequences of laryngectomy on the quality of life of patients and their close relations and developed a pluridisciplinary therapeutic education program, (2) the prospective intervention "replication" phase aims at evaluating the programme's transferability in three centres and (3) the cluster-randomised multicentric comparative intervention phase, will assess the benefits of the developed programme. Phase I identified nine themes of workshops related to therapeutic education, training and coordination of care. The developed programme should reinforce town-hospital links to improve help, follow-up and support for patients and their close relations.


Asunto(s)
Familia/psicología , Neoplasias Laríngeas/rehabilitación , Laringectomía/rehabilitación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Francia , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirugía , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
16.
Value Health ; 21(6): 685-691, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29909873

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient navigation programs to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence have become widespread in recent years, especially among deprived populations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the first patient navigation program in France. METHODS: A total of 16,250 participants were randomized to either the usual screening group (n = 8145) or the navigation group (n = 8105). Navigation consisted of personalized support provided by social workers. A cost-effectiveness analysis of navigation versus usual screening was conducted from the payer perspective in the Picardy region of northern France. We considered nonmedical direct costs in the analysis. RESULTS: Navigation was associated with a significant increase of 3.3% (24.4% vs. 21.1%; P = 0.003) in participation. The increase in participation was higher among affluent participants (+4.1%; P = 0.01) than among deprived ones (+2.6%; P = 0.07). The cost per additional individual screened by navigation compared with usual screening (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) was €1212 globally and €1527 among deprived participants. Results were sensitive to navigator wages and to the intervention effectiveness whose variations had the greatest impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Patient navigation aiming at increasing CRC screening participation is more efficient among affluent individuals. Nevertheless, when the intervention is implemented for the entire population, social inequalities in CRC screening adherence increase. To reduce social inequalities, patient navigation should therefore be restricted to deprived populations, despite not being the most cost-effective strategy, and accepted to bear a higher extra cost per additional individual screened.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Navegación de Pacientes/economía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Análisis por Conglomerados , Femenino , Francia , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente , Navegación de Pacientes/organización & administración , Participación del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Trabajadores Sociales
17.
Prev Med ; 103: 76-83, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28823681

RESUMEN

Despite free colorectal cancer screening in France, participation remains low and low socioeconomic status is associated with a low participation. Our aim was to assess the effect of a screening navigation program on participation and the reduction in social inequalities in a national-level organized mass screening program for colorectal cancer by fecal-occult blood test (FOBT). A multicenter (3 French departments) cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted over two years. The cluster was a small geographical unit stratified according to a deprivation index and the place of residence. A total of 14,556 subjects (72 clusters) were included in the control arm where the FOBT program involved the usual postal reminders, and 14,373 subjects (66 clusters) were included in the intervention arm. Intervention concerned only non-attended subjects with a phone number available defined as the navigable population. A screening navigator was added to the usual screening organization to identify and eliminate barriers to CRC screening with personalized contact. The participation rate by strata increased in the intervention arm. The increase was greater in affluent strata than in deprived ones. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the intervention mainly with phone navigation increased individual participation (OR=1.19 [1.10, 1.29]) in the navigable population. For such interventions to reduce social inequalities in a country with a national level organized mass screening program, they should first be administered to deprived populations, in accordance with the principle of proportionate universalism. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01555450.


Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo , Sangre Oculta , Navegación de Pacientes , Factores Socioeconómicos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
18.
Prev Med ; 100: 84-88, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28408217

RESUMEN

Evaluation of mobile mammography for reducing social and geographic inequalities in breast cancer screening participation. We examined the responses to first invitations to undergo breast cancer screening from 2003 to 2012 in Orne, a French department. Half of the participants could choose between screening in a radiologist's office or a mobile mammography (MM) unit. We calculated the participation rate and individual participation model according to age group, deprivation quintile and distance. Among participants receiving an MM invitation, the preference was for MM. This was especially the case in the age group >70years and increased with deprivation quintile and remoteness. There were no significant participation trends with regard to deprivation or remoteness. In the general population, the influence of deprivation and remoteness was markedly diminished. After adjustment, MM invitation was associated with a significant increase in individual participation (odds ratio=2.9). MM can target underserved and remote communities, allowing greater participation and decreasing social and geographic inequalities in the general population. Proportionate universalism is an effective principle for public health policy in reducing health inequalities.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mamografía , Tamizaje Masivo , Unidades Móviles de Salud , Factores Socioeconómicos , Anciano , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Francia , Geografía Médica , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Población Rural
20.
Trials ; 17: 159, 2016 Mar 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27004412

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Photoplethysmography with a digital sensor (ClearSight, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) connected to a dedicated monitor (EV 1000, Edwards Lifesciences) was recently proposed for use in performing hemodynamic optimization during surgery. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of photoplethysmography on the incidence of postoperative complications compared with the conventional hemodynamic algorithm, which uses mean arterial pressure. METHODS/DESIGN: The hemodynamic optimization using photoplethysmography (PANEX3) trial is a monocentric, randomized, single-blind, controlled, two parallel arm, superiority trial, randomizing 160 patients with an intermediate risk of postoperative complications after colorectal surgery. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The hemodynamic optimization is conducted using a specified hemodynamic algorithm either with photoplethysmography (the photoplethysmography group) or with conventional mean arterial pressure (the control group). The anesthesiologist performed a 1:1 randomization the day before surgery using a scratch card, which is available 24/7. The randomization sequence is generated using permutated blocks. Both the patients and surgeons are blinded to the allocation group. The primary outcome is the incidence of at least one postoperative complication during the 30 days following surgery. Two independent experts, who were blinded to the group allocations, validate the complication for each patient using an a priori classification. The secondary outcomes are to study the total number of postoperative complications, the real length of hospital stays, and the postoperative mortality between each group. DISCUSSION: The PANEX3 trial is the first randomized controlled study conducted to investigate whether perioperative hemodynamic optimization using photoplethysmography during colorectal surgery could decrease the incidence of patients having at least one postoperative complication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02343601.


Asunto(s)
Colon/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Hemodinámica , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Fotopletismografía , Recto/cirugía , Algoritmos , Presión Arterial , Protocolos Clínicos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Francia , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Método Simple Ciego , Volumen Sistólico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...